• @IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    1001 month ago

    I’ve been seeing it pop up more in embedded/PC based devices. Seems to be replacing Windows XP and the other embedded Windows versions. Guess Microsoft wants too much for those licenses.

    • Björn Tantau
      link
      fedilink
      461 month ago

      I was really surprised seeing KDE on the kiosk at our local unemployment office which is notorious for bad IT. That was 7 or 8 years ago.

      • Fuck spez
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Even bad IT people can still run Linux, though.

        Signed,
        A bad IT guy.

        Edit: I run Arch BTW

    • @adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 month ago

      kwik trip’s self-serve ‘fresh blends’ smoothie machines use it. see one crashed every now and then here.

    • Ricky Rigatoni
      link
      fedilink
      101 month ago

      I used to run 8.1 embedded as my desktop and honestly if my exoerience with it was anything to go by windows embedded has been only requiring more resources while losing features that make having a separate embedded edition make sense.

    • rem26_art
      link
      fedilink
      361 month ago

      “Please just put the fries in the bag. I don’t care about open source or that GNU is the operating system and Linux is the kernel or whatever you’re yappin about!”

  • DudeImMacGyver
    link
    fedilink
    471 month ago

    Beats the hell out of paying Microsoft so you can keep running your business.

      • NebLem
        link
        fedilink
        19
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Commercial Windows licenses aren’t typically covered by the equipment installers (or if they are, the cost is passed on to you instead of subsidizing it), have expiration dates, and you’ll want security updates.

        I think the comment had the implication that the system would be running on Windows if not Ubuntu.

          • DudeImMacGyver
            link
            fedilink
            21 month ago

            It can vary, but there are multiple licenses at the enterprise level with varying agreements and costs. Not just the OS for your server, but software, services, end user devices, and other random things that most folks never think about because they don’t have to.

            In some cases FOSS can take a big chunk out of those costs or even eliminate them entirely if you have good staff that knows their stuff and your business doesn’t need or can make it’s own niche software/systems. If you build it in-house, you have to support and maintain it but it’s still often cheaper than many paid solutions.

      • @the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        128 days ago

        If you’re as big as Wendy’s you probably use volume licensing. While perpetual licenses are available via volume licensing, many businesses choose a subscription model instead. There’s advantages to both depending on your use case. Wendys corporate policies may also require a support contract from vendors, which can get pricy.

  • @Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    151 month ago

    I wonder if Wendy’s donates back to the project. Ive seen so many companies use Foss software and not pay anything and it pisses me off every time.

    • Amon
      link
      fedilink
      81 month ago

      Tbf it’s just a kiosk so I doubt there’s anything special other than a kiosk software and Ubuntu core image

      • @Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        Yeah but they should still pay Ubuntu for using their os to make profit off.

  • KbSez
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 month ago

    smart. 1000% less problems than windows and 5000% more secure

  • @A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Thanks for sharing, always nice to see!

    But nowadays I’d be surprised if one of these display devices ran Windows or some similar crap that is NOT Linux.

    Ubuntu/Canonical did, imho, the right thing to offer paid support for what is otherwise a free OS. That’s what companies care for, that cannot afford a full IT employee or even department. Of course Redhat et. al. also offer that but Ubuntu seems more suitable for smaller solutions?

    • @0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      11 month ago

      That’s what companies care for, that cannot afford a full IT employee or even department.

      I doubt those companies can afford paid support from the likes of Cannonical and Red Hat - their licenses are solely for other at-scale companies to write off expenses and shift blame if something hits the fan.

  • Maeve
    link
    fedilink
    61 month ago

    It’s a socialism for me not thee business model.