Sjmarf to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoHehsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up112arrow-down10
arrow-up112arrow-down1imageHehsh.itjust.worksSjmarf to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square25fedilink
minus-squarepewterlinkfedilink5•1 year agoq1 and q2 can be negative. The force is the same as if they were positive because -1 x -1 = 1
minus-squareLimitless_screaminglinkfedilink1•1 year agoIn this case yes, but if q1 was -20μC, q2 was 30μC, and r was 0.5m, then using -20μC as it is would make F equal to -21.6N which is just 21.6N of attraction force between the two charges.
minus-squarePelicanenlinkfedilink2•1 year agoIf they are oppositely charged particles, I would expect that there is a force of attraction acting on them, yes.
minus-squareLimitless_screaminglinkfedilink0•1 year agoI am not saying that’s wrong, just that there’s 21.6N of attraction force between the two charges not -21.6N.
minus-square@Bene7rddso@feddit.delinkfedilink2•1 year agoNo, if the force is negative it acts in the opposite direction
minus-squarePelicanenlinkfedilink1•1 year agoYes, and a force acting in the opposite direction of the distance is an attractive force.
q1 and q2 can be negative. The force is the same as if they were positive because -1 x -1 = 1
In this case yes, but if q1 was -20μC, q2 was 30μC, and r was 0.5m, then using -20μC as it is would make F equal to -21.6N which is just 21.6N of attraction force between the two charges.
If they are oppositely charged particles, I would expect that there is a force of attraction acting on them, yes.
I am not saying that’s wrong, just that there’s 21.6N of attraction force between the two charges not -21.6N.
But those are the same thing.
No, if the force is negative it acts in the opposite direction
Yes, and a force acting in the opposite direction of the distance is an attractive force.