• @pmc@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
      17•19 hours ago

      They now require a non-free Bitwarden SDK component. That’s what this whole conversation is about.

      • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        2•5 hours ago

        And the whole conversation is about a bug, not a change in direction…

        Update: Bitwarden posted to X this evening to reaffirm that it’s a “packaging bug” and that “Bitwarden remains committed to the open source licensing model.”

      • fmstratEnglish
        1•10 hours ago

        Only the desktop client. And the response is that not being able to compile sans SDK is an issue they will resolve.

        I still think this is bad directionally, but we need to see what happens.

        • asudoxOPEnglish
          5•16 hours ago

          “You may not use this SDK to develop applications for use with software other than Bitwarden (including non-compatible implementations of Bitwarden) or to develop another SDK.”

          This is a condition when using their SDK. This is not considered a free (as in freedom) component because it violates freedom 0: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html#four-freedoms