YICHM to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world • edit-28 months agoUsing 24-hour format and 12-hour format together is worse than using either of those alone.message-square22fedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down114file-text
arrow-up163arrow-down1message-squareUsing 24-hour format and 12-hour format together is worse than using either of those alone.YICHM to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world • edit-28 months agomessage-square22fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareKSP Atlaslinkfedilink10•8 months agoClearly the solution is to adopt decimal time and have 10 hours per day, 100 minutes per hour, and 100 seconds per minute
minus-squareDerpgonlinkfedilink3•8 months agoProbably failed because you have to do math for numbers above 20.
minus-squareYICHMOPlinkfedilink1•8 months agoNow I’m wondering whether corporations would use 6-hour shifts (2.5 dec) instead of 8-hour shifts (3.33… dec) when switching to decimal time.
Clearly the solution is to adopt decimal time and have 10 hours per day, 100 minutes per hour, and 100 seconds per minute
The French actually tried this
Probably failed because you have to do math for numbers above 20.
Now I’m wondering whether corporations would use 6-hour shifts (2.5 dec) instead of 8-hour shifts (3.33… dec) when switching to decimal time.