

This might be dumb, but what if you used parsec on the other machine?
This might be dumb, but what if you used parsec on the other machine?
What’s kiwi farms? I’m not really in the loop on this issue.
If you’re worried, download it into a file first and read it.
This is hard to say without knowing the use of the scripts. If it’s something to be used as normal CLI tools, probably some place that’s in the user’s path. If it’s something else, I would just have it download to the current working directory so that the user has the choice on where to put it.
The only thing I build from source on a normal basis is LMMS because there’s some features on main you just can’t get anywhere else. For example, the slicer that comes with LMMS nightly isn’t in the builds, and particularly recently someone pushed a commit that allows for resizing of the slicer, so I just had to pull that and build it.
This sounds amazing! I will also put here there’s also chronometer that has a lot of the same functionality as fitnesspal but without the subscription, but you have to use an account.
I still don’t get it
Dumb question but is that a real command line tool
Why not just compress a directory then encrypt that?
Sweet - I didn’t realize that malware is tailored for one OS usually, but that makes a lot more sense.
This is great I really appreciate it :)
I love you so much. Never change
Why do the tech heads show why it won’t be adopted mainstream any time soon?
deleted by creator
Linux doesn’t always work. We know that. But it looks like you’re misconstruing your specific issue with some broader argument for Linux being mainstream. The fact that you connected it to a switch tells me that youre already more advanced than the average user. I get you’re annoyed, but you can also just ask about your specific issue.
The article made a few good points, but a good amount of it was conjecture. I liked the part about comparing the two functions and showing that exceptions are faster but I think a big thing he’s not getting is readability. Even in the functions he showed, you can directly see that the one using std::expected has the happy path and error path directly in the function signature, whereas the exception one doesn’t.
As for the “error kind” trap he was talking about, that definitely exists, but ignores the fact that you can also get this same kind of error from exceptions. I’ve definitely gotten exceptions that I didn’t understand from Python or Java libraries, but it’s not a problem with exceptions but a problem with how they’re shown. If there’s nothing to tell me that I should have thought of that error, it shouldn’t be an expectation for a dev to have thought of it.
Nah I don’t have any more examples cuz I haven’t been using vim for like 30 years. I think the other comments make good points tho
I use vim bindings in vscode, but I’m trying to switch to neovim.
It’s hard to talk about efficiencies without use cases but here’s some that I like:
Don’t most of these projects have a requirements.txt? That would be my first thought when trying to find deps. Getting the size of a package is above my head.