Because Lemmy only has political moderation.

That’s what I tell my partners. They are, thus far, unimpressed.

I, uhhh, well, I’m not sure what to say. I feel like we’ve been through a lot just now, and I just need to take a minute…

It’s a goddamned plague.

I’ve meticulously put black tape over every single little light that glows in my bedroom to let me know something is plugged in. Don’t make me tape over the entire light switch, too.

Sidetalkin’!

They give the Miyazaki quote and then say, “of course, he wasn’t talking about generative AI, but he could have been.”

What kind of article is this? They misattributed a quote, then admitted the misattributed the quote, then doubled down on it, and then threw in a political message.

People, this is rage bait. It’s yellow journalism. Don’t fall for this shit.

And all of them sharing a single 26k connection, too

-Groucho Marx

It was discontinued in 2011. Anything that is out there today is outdated at best, and malicious at worst.

Which is hilarious, because most of the shit out there today seems to be written by them.

Yeah. Everyone forgot the second half of “Trust, but Verify”. If I ask an LLM a question, I’m only doing it because I’m not 100% sure how to look up the info. Once it gives me the answer, I’m checking that answer with sources because it has given me a better ability to find what I was looking for. Trusting an LLM blindly is just as bad as going on Facebook for healthcare advice.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Before I even clicked it I knew there would be no real journalism involved. It’s just parroting the video the LegalEagle put out, so if you’d rather give your click to the creator, just watch the Youtube video, and don’t bother with the techcrunch “article”.

The non-bot accounts are leaving the platform, what should we do?

Quick, milk the rubes!

deleted by creator